(416) 969-9263
Menu

Refugee Appeals Cases

Mohamed v. Canada

(Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Federal Court, IMM-7482-22, 2023 FC 1330

Issue: Will the Court set aside a Refugee Board decision to strip away refugee status over identity, when the Refugee Board refuses to make a finding on whether the refugee has proven his real and true identity ?

More Information

Sanmugarasa v. Canada

(Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Federal Court, F.C.J. No. 568, 2023 FC 974

Issue: Will the Court set aside a decision over credibility that is based only on minor and insignificant inconsistencies ?

More Information

Singh v. Canada

(Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Federal Court, IMM-6370-21, 2023 FC 620

Issue: Will the Court allow an appeal where a refugee claimant have been the subject of a compromising video ?

More Information

Woldemaryame v. Canada

(Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship) Federal Court F.C.J. No. 49, 2018 FC 58

Issue: Will the Federal Court intervene if the Refugee Appeal Division refuses to accept a refugee claimant’s identity card into evidence?

More Information

Taho v. Canada

(Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Federal Court, F.C.J. No. 717, 2015 FC 718

Issue: Will the Federal Court set aside a refusal if the Refugee Board’s state protection analysis is unreasonable?

More Information

Basharat v. Canada

(Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Federal Court, F.C.J. No. 644, 2015 FC 559

Issue: Can a refugee claim that has been declared abandoned successfully be reopened?

More Information

Parmananthan v. Canada

(The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Federal Court, IMM-10127-12 May 29, 2014

Issue: Will the Court allow an appeal due to a change in a refugee’s circumstances created by government statements after his arrival in Canada?

More Information

Panchalingam v. Canada

(The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Federal Court, IMM-12751-12 May 14, 2014

Issue: Will the Court allow an appeal when presented with evidence of faulty interpretation at a refugee hearing ?

More Information

Hussain v. Canada

(The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Federal Court, IMM-9590-12 Sept. 27, 2013

Issue: Will the Court intervene when the tribunal misunderstands the evidence presented to it?

More Information

Dessie v. Canada

(The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Federal Court, IMM-3927-11 Dec. 19, 2011

Issue: Will the Federal Court set aside a decision where the Refugee Board ignores important evidence on country conditions?

More Information

Kaleja v. Canada

(Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Federal Court, IMM-1306-09 March 4, 2010

Issue: Will the Federal Court set aside a Refugee Board refusal when the Board has not stated clearly why the claimant’s persecution differs from the persecution the Board acknowledges is faced by Roma in the Czech Republic?

More Information

Javed v. Canada

(Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Federal Court, IMM-7575-03, October 20, 2004

Issue: Can a refugee claim that was declared abandoned be reopened if the reasons provided by the Refugee Board for the abandonment are insufficient?

More Information

Maheswaran v. Canada

(Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Federal Court, IMM-2507-02 July 24, 2003.

Issue: If a refugee claimant fails to tell a visa office that she faces persecution in her country when she applies for a visitor visa – will it be held against her at her refugee hearing in Canada?

 

More Information

Jeyaseelan v. Canada

(Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Federal Court Trial Division, IMM-2510-01, March 28, 2002

Issue: What factors must the Court consider in a repeat refugee claim, and is finding a lack of credibility automatically fatal to a refugee claim?

More Information

Kanagaratnam v. Canada

(Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Federal Court Trial Division, IMM-3798-99, August 23, 2000

Issue: Did the Refugee Board fall into error in failing to address new evidence presented in a repeat refugee claim?

 

More Information

Mylvaganam v. Canada

(Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Federal Court Trial Division, IMM-3457-99, July 24, 2000

Issue: Where the Refugee Board finds a claimant’s history of persecution not credible, but accepts his identity and ethnicity, is the Court still obliged to assess objective country conditions to determine the level of risk of return?

More Information

Ahmed v. Canada

(Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Federal Court Trial Division, IMM-2931-99, March 29, 2000

Issue: Can the Refugee Board determine that a claimant can safely relocate to a large city in his country without specifically posing the question for the claimant to address?

More Information

Ramanathan v. Canada

(Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Federal Court Trial Division, IMM-5091-97, August 19, 1998

Issue: Is the Refugee Board entitled to consider humanitarian and compassionate factors in deciding whether it is reasonable for a claimant to relocate in another part of his country?

More Information

Abdi v. Canada

(Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Federal Court Trial Division, IMM-1195-97, January 14, 1998

Issue: If there is an area in the country where a refugee claimant can be safe, does the Refugee Board fall into error in failing to address the danger in travelling to and accessing that area from the claimant’s native village?

More Information

Basharat v. Canada

(Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Federal Court, F.C.J. No. 644, 2015 FC 559

Issue: Can a refugee claim that has been declared abandoned successfully be reopened?

More Information


Back

Request Information





Submit

Recent blog posts

Posted by on 29 Jan 2018

The Canadian Express Entry Program has only been around for a few years. In a nutshell, the program is designed to give the best applicants…

Read More

View All

Media Coverage

1.2 million temporary residents must leave Canada in 2025 when their status expires. But will they?